View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
lstmmrbls Site Admin
Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IMO it is not a dug marble. And all the defensive remarks in the listing do not add creditability to the sale. Just my opinion _________________ Peace,Galen |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wvglass
Joined: 22 May 2008 Posts: 108 Location: West Virginia
|
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not only that . . . but Roger Hardy doesn't like ole Cliffy--told him not to come back to his store. That was a red flag for my buddy and me.
Cliffy remelts marbles and has listed some of his before.
THEN . . . there was the fellow with the Ebay ID mikeswestvirginiamarbles who was stealing photos of marbles and selling them as his own. I found out AFTER I had won two auctions and he listed more . . . and I OWN one of the marbles he listed.
For what it's worth . . . not all WVians are like that. At least I'm not. Then again it may not apply since I don't sell mibs, only collect them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Chamberlain
Joined: 18 May 2009 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Black & Blue marble really hasn't much to distinguish itself except for being Black & Blue. Rather dinged up in appearance.
Regarding the two other referenced marbles: (1) Clearly torch made and (2) clearly a remelt.
This fellow (Clifford) has at least on two occasions in his descriptions tried to ride in on the shoestrings of Roger Hardy. I believe Roger would give him short shrift and a boot out the door!
David |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|